TVXQ Lawyer Angry over 45M False Rumor

TVXQ lawyer angry over false Junsu rumor dbsk009
The lawyer representing TVXQ is furious over what he says are false claims made by SM Entertainment (SM) that Junsu is using a 45 million won “advanced payment” from SM in relation to the lawsuit against SM.

According to translated reports, TVXQ’s attorney (Sejong) ‘could not control his anger at the rumor’.

Sejong said if SM gave Junsu an “advanced payment”, it was routinely done for all members so they can pay their share of income taxes.

Sejong:

“If that did happen, it was probably to settle his account for his income taxes… [SM] are being ridiculous by making it seem like Xiah Junsu received that payment to prepare for this trial.”

First Hearing: TVXQ vs SM in Court

First Hearing DBSK TVXQ Tohoshinki dongbanger.com
Translated accounts of the first Court hearing between TVXQ (DBSK / Tohoshinki) and their management agency SM Entertainment (SM) are making their way around the net.

After filing court docs in District Court for improved contract terms, Jaejoong, Yoochun and Junsu had their first hearing August 21 2009 (Seoul South Korea time).

Both TVXQ and SM agreed that they don’t want a disbandment of the group at all. 

According to the way the reports were translated, three members of the group are asking for “a suspension of their contract due to unlawful clauses”. This would probably be in relation to the Exclusivity clause which bars the guys from being involved in any side businesses for their own personal income not controlled by SM.

First Hearing: TVXQ vs SM in Court

First Hearing DBSK TVXQ Tohoshinki dongbanger.com
Translated accounts of the first Court hearing between TVXQ (DBSK / Tohoshinki) and their management agency SM Entertainment (SM) are making their way around the net.

After filing court docs in District Court for improved contract terms, Jaejoong, Yoochun and Junsu had their first hearing August 21 2009 (Seoul South Korea time).

Both TVXQ and SM agreed that they don’t want a disbandment of the group at all. 

According to the way the reports were translated, three members of the group are asking for “a suspension of their contract due to unlawful clauses”. This would probably be in relation to the Exclusivity clause which bars the guys from being involved in any side businesses for their own personal income not controlled by SM.